<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it just me&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/</link>
	<description>Phill Sacre's online diary. Type thing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillsacre.me.uk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally!!!</title>
		<link>http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-25986</link>
		<dc:creator>phillsacre.me.uk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Finally!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/#comment-25986</guid>
		<description>[...] identified at least one or two defects (here and here) in IE7 - not sure if they&#8217;ve been fixed yet. Either way it was a pretty poor show, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] identified at least one or two defects (here and here) in IE7 &#8211; not sure if they&#8217;ve been fixed yet. Either way it was a pretty poor show, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank "Archie"</title>
		<link>http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-9415</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank "Archie"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/#comment-9415</guid>
		<description>I documented a new workaround for IE&#039;s disabled option bug in my &lt;a href=&quot;http://archie.blogr.com/stories/57864/&quot;&gt;first blog entry&lt;/a&gt;  - I&#039;d be happy about feed-back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I documented a new workaround for IE&#8217;s disabled option bug in my <a href="http://archie.blogr.com/stories/57864/">first blog entry</a>  &#8211; I&#8217;d be happy about feed-back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill</title>
		<link>http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5408</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/#comment-5408</guid>
		<description>Well spotted re: the typo ;)

Actually before I wrote that blog entry I did some googling to see whether &quot;ClearType&quot; was actually the name of the thing or not, and apparently it&#039;s been in Windows for a while! So yeah, maybe Windows is just rubbish. But, you know, we&#039;ve know that for ages anyway :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well spotted re: the typo ;)</p>
<p>Actually before I wrote that blog entry I did some googling to see whether &#8220;ClearType&#8221; was actually the name of the thing or not, and apparently it&#8217;s been in Windows for a while! So yeah, maybe Windows is just rubbish. But, you know, we&#8217;ve know that for ages anyway :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/comment-page-1/#comment-5407</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phillsacre.me.uk/2007/02/08/it-it-just-me/#comment-5407</guid>
		<description>I echo that, but from a slightly different angle.  I recently discovered that the image scaling capabilities built into Windows are rubbish.  I was designing a web page on my Mac and had an image set to expand or contract to the width of its container (width: 100%;).  This worked really nicely on my Mac on each browser I tested it on, but as soon as I went over to my PC it all went rather pixelated, in both IE7 and Firefox, so it&#039;s not something to do with IE necessarily but in the way Windows itself handles these types of graphics.  Just one more reason I prefer Macs!

Oh, and your title &quot;It it just me&quot; may need an amendment to the first word... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I echo that, but from a slightly different angle.  I recently discovered that the image scaling capabilities built into Windows are rubbish.  I was designing a web page on my Mac and had an image set to expand or contract to the width of its container (width: 100%;).  This worked really nicely on my Mac on each browser I tested it on, but as soon as I went over to my PC it all went rather pixelated, in both IE7 and Firefox, so it&#8217;s not something to do with IE necessarily but in the way Windows itself handles these types of graphics.  Just one more reason I prefer Macs!</p>
<p>Oh, and your title &#8220;It it just me&#8221; may need an amendment to the first word&#8230; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
